Да, Денис, Вы абсолютно правы: "идеи о 3-10 домах", которые фактически не дают из 100% ни одного процента сбоев и ошибок при определении наличия/отсутствия у натива высшего образования - это ч0ткий показатель невежества астролога.
Последний раз редактировалось Katya, 06.08.2009 в 07:33.
У Вас не нашлось ни одного вменяемого ответа на вопросы, поставленные Маргаритой. Кроме тех, за которые Вам больше ни один честный человек руки не подаст.
Зато нашлось продолжение в том же духе, - Лжи, Клеветы, Фальсификаций, и... - снова МЕЛОДРАМА.
Только "жертва" новая. Теперь Вам начала мешать Ирина.
Полно, не беспокойтесь, никто не думает сомневаться, что Вы с Антоном Г. родились с "серебряной ложкой во рту" на случай везения в манипуляциях и жульничестве книжкой Эзры под мышкой.
Денис, а помните как Вы в Мавритании, во время археологических раскопок, книгу Эзры откопали? На английском.А что, у Вас уже вроде способы гнобления и травли на поток поставлены. Стоило Ирине вступиться за Маргариту, и о Маргарите уже речь не идет.
Там Вы попросту опозорились с "аргументами" о том, почему надо заниматься плагиатом, отбирать деньги у коллег, а потом объявлять их "сумасшедшими".
Anton Grigoryev already had other problems, true? I can know - in a few words which ones?
Everybody suggested me this here. They told me that a man who cares about his name does not behave like that and if he could let his name in the mud it's just because Anton already had.
As usually, I dismissed these words too, but I see again they were right.
If a was a "madwoman" it is just because I trusted in Anton and his words, but in Italy a man who takes money from a woman and then disappears and which word has no value, is like a worm, even less.
And I see that Denis did not reply about Anton's books and expertise.
Still it's very easy to show. I just could make a print-screen of Anton's enquiries about deponent verbs - I year of Latin- and put in my blog or here.
Then people could wonder how someone who says he is a translator from Medieval/Renaissance asks about deponent verbs.
Anton thinks that I never noticed his mistakes and his stupid idea to know Italian and Italian literature more than me.
I saw and other saw too, just I'm not interested in scholarship in personal relationship. I found just funny and lovely.
Moreover when Denis mentions "who is who", Anton has a secondary school and no possibility to have books, let alone the ones everybody have through the Internet, or Zoller ones - which everybody have too.
On my side, I'm sorry to say I was always the first student in my class, I have an university degree and I live ten minutes from the oldest libraries in the world.
If we would be in a competition - which never was me- I would win in 10 seconds :)
In every case, I agree with Irina, Anton does not copy, elaborates others' work. I can do this very easily too in my blog, just I quote sources.
Anton Grigoryev, on the contrary says, everything is his. Example: Agostino lecture, I talked with that Karine, the organizer.
Anton added to the text we wrote together, other information taken by Saxl lecture, the one I became mad to find, so now in his mind, the lecture is different.
I searched all the material, paid for it, wrote half of the article and made the power point presentation, then he added some lines from the same papers I found and deleted my name because it was his work!
This are scholar ways in Russia?
And about my money and Anton binds, Denis are not saying anything too?
Why Anton tried to organize one month ago a lecture based on Bezza book? Tetrabiblos have 4 books, but for a strange case, Anton would talk just about the first one and his commentators, maybe because Bezza did not write about the other three?
Ну не получилось у тебя в Москве из Маргариты сделать Чудовище, а из Антона – Красавицу, - ну и что? Эка невидаль! Всяк блин бывает комом, особенно тот, на который муки не нашлось. Ну так бери муку сортов не фальшивых и воды не переливай! Без муки ни одно тесто не замесишь. Без муки, на воде и соли, хорошо о блинах только планы строить да сказки рассказывать.
Интересно, если бы Маргарита так настойчиво не протестовала против воровства, плагиата и клеветы, увидала б я твоё лицо настоящее или не дожила бы? Будем считать, что повезло. Ай-да Маргарита!
Как видишь, это началось не сегодня, просто тогда поводом были стоики, а сегодня Маргарита.
В той ветке ты найдешь ссылки на астролоджер, где все тоже самое - тот же стиль, тот же пафос, та же Вичайте, клеймящая негодяев. Мотивы на столько приевшиеся, что от них уже тошнит. Может тебе, как поколению молодому, это все еще интересно, но, поверь, скоро и тебе надоест ;)
Володя, ГДЕ вы это нашли такое?
уж сколько я там нахожусь -ничего подобного. На форуме бывают конечно высказывания немного с перебором (те, что помню, точно не от Дениса) -но это люди Позиция самого Дениса -только астрология, любые сплетни и желания раздуть темы не в ту сторону пресекаются достаточно быстро...
А данный стишок вообще к России какое отношение имеет тема была про Селену и Лилит -и смысл процитированног был совершенно иной... или это уже сформированная такая реакция на фразу "страна блядей"
если в толпе женщин крикнуть "эй, ты, б..дь" -всегда найдутся женщины, которые воспримут это на свой счет
Which plot is this?
Moreover I don't know anybody here....
The story of the "plot" in Italy is associated with Stalin Soviet Union, "sagavor" so it's funny to me reading here :)
There is no plot.
Anton just should say which value give to his word of honour and why he disappeared and moreover with 1600 euro from a woman and with several debts for the books he asked me to buy for him.
And this in Italy would be enough.
If not for you, maybe you can explain why Anton tried to organize less than a month ago a lecture from Bezza book about the first book of Tetrabiblos.
For what I know - maybe I should ask Anton- Tetrabiblos has 4 books, but Bezza collected the opinion of the main commentators just for the first book,
and for strange concurrence Anton wanted to talk just about the first. Why he did not chose the the third or the fourth about nativities?
Maybe because he had not Bezza's book to lecture about deleting the name of the author?
Moreover you are the owner of your site when people like IVA or SVALIANSKY write there it's because trust in you.
You let them pay Anton Grigoryev for something which is not written by him- it's not very correct from your side.
Again and again there is no plot. It's Anton who is putting his name on everybody's mouth.
why you cannot say anything about me just that I'm mad but carefully avoiding to give any explanation?
If Anton thinks it's a plot he can write to me and then I will hear his reasons.
I just to say that Anton has not difficulty in deleting the name of scholars and use their work, and then he says around is the expert of Latin, Greek, Renaissance and Medieval astrology and much more. And earning money in the same time
Like this it's very easy to be an expert....everybody can do.
p.s. let me know if the question was different, I understand very little
Really, Denis does not write here, at the forum, anything: about your stolen money, truths about Anton's books. The only thing, than he is now taken, so it that throws mud at founders of project ARGO, Irina and Vladimir.
This book has been published in 1990/
This question should be consulting in Russian jurist.
I am not sure, but maybe old test like this can translation in Russian without permission.
I know old test in foreign language may translation in Russian withoot any permission
I am sorry, but I do not know since year must do it
In Soviet Union soviet scients translation foreign work and publish it without any permission/
Володя, ГДЕ вы это нашли такое? 
Позиция самого Дениса -только астрология, любые сплетни и желания раздуть темы не в ту сторону пресекаются достаточно быстро...
тема была про Селену и Лилит
-и смысл процитированног был совершенно иной... или это уже сформированная такая реакция на фразу "страна блядей"
Линейный вид
